Of all 6,000 drugs tracked in the EMA data, C19 jabs have the highest adverse event profile.
Yet no action.
The regulators need to be handcuffs.


https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukema/viz/LarebMeldingenDashboard/LarebDashboard

EDWARD DOWD

According to Dr. Mark Hyman, the keto diet "activates the brain's repair systems" and "helps cognitive function at every level... from autism, to Alzheimer's, to schizophrenia, to depression."

"Sugar is really driving this big problem—sugar and starch... When you eat these foods, your body gets dysregulated. And when you use a diet that actually shuts off these cravings... it doesn't take long."

"In five or ten days, we get a 70% reduction from all symptoms and all diseases by people just changing their diet."

Full interview

For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia

Merch: https://wideawake.clothing

X | IG | Rumble

Independent journalist Whitney Webb deconstructs the climate agenda in under 90 seconds. 🔥

For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia

Merch: https://wideawake.clothing

X | IG | Rumble

Independent journalist Whitney Webb deconstructs the climate agenda in under 90 seconds. 🔥

For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia

Merch: https://wideawake.clothing

X | IG | Rumble

Most of you probably already know this...

Agenda 2030 is not about saving the planet; it’s about controlling it. It’s a global operating system built by unelected elites to monitor, manage, and manipulate every aspect of life.

Under the guise of “sustainability,” they’re replacing freedom with compliance, ownership with access, privacy with surveillance. The UN gives it the moral mask, the WEF writes the script, and NGOs enforce it. You won’t own anything, and you’ll be happy. You'll be tracked, traced, scanned, blocked, silenced and totally controlled.

This isn’t the future. It’s already installed.

Digital ID is the master key to the entire Agenda 2030 system; once they control your identity, they control your access to money, travel, healthcare, and even speech. Reject it, because accepting it is accepting total surveillance disguised as convenience.

Join us, 18th October, Central London at 1 PM, Marble Arch to demonstrate your mass non-compliance.

Stand up now, refuse the digital chains, and be brave... freedom only survives if we defend it, NOW!

@FionaRoseDiamond

Surely if full fat Coke was so bad for you that you are only allowed to drink one glass, it should be banned from sale? Or only sold in shops in 500ml containers with a health warning ?

https://www.tg-me.com/ABridgen

"Bill Gates softens stance on climate change risks, sparking criticism on social media" - Gabriel Hays, Fox, 29OCT2025

>Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates’ new remarks on climate change surprised many social media users Tuesday.

>In a new post, Gates softened his stance on climate change, writing "doomsday view of climate change is wrong."

>The view is a departure from his previous statements on climate change. The New York Post wrote Gates once said that climate change "could be worse" than the COVID-19 pandemic.

>"While some may be tempted to applaud Bill Gates for finally seeing the light, the reality is that he inflicted untold damage on society and an entire generation.

>Rasmussen Reports pollster Mark Mitchell remarked, "Bill Gates is smart. He knows Clown World has gone on too long. But will he apologize for his role in brainwashing hundreds of millions of people?"

https://archive.ph/ekVFd
(Climate?)

Update on Bridgen v Hancock

By way of update on Mr Hancock’s appeal, Lord Shaun Bailey (who is being sued for libel by Dale Vince OBE) wrote to the Court of Appeal on 1 September 2025: – “consideration may also need to be given to the appeals being heard together”.
On 16 September 2025 Lord Justice Warby “noted the representations on behalf of Lord Bailey and directed that any response by any of the other parties to any of the three appeals should be filed by no later than 30 September 2025”.
On 18 September 2025 Mr Hancock stated that he “objects to the proposal to list his appeal (in which permission has already been granted) together with these separate proceedings, insofar as permission is granted in those proceedings. Our client is very concerned that listing the appeals together will delay both the listing and determination of his appeal, particularly in circumstances where the claim against him was issued by Mr Bridgen on 19 May 2023, well over two years ago.”
On 22 September 2025 Mr Vince contended via his legal team that “There are also specific reasons why the Hancock v Bridgen and Vince v Bailey appeals ought to be heard together. Both concern the operation of s.3(4) and s.3(5) of the Defamation Act 2013.”
On 30 September 2025 my position was advanced as follows: “In these circumstances Mr Bridgen agrees with Mr Vince regarding the specific reasons which Mr Vince advances for the Hancock v Bridgen and Vince v Bailey appeals to be heard together.”
A month on we have heard nothing from the Court of Appeal.
What is going on?

https://www.tg-me.com/ABridgen

OMG! This is brilliant!
Transindigenous!
🤣🤣🤣

https://www.tg-me.com/LauraAbolichannel