—|NAVIGATION|—

Indexes
[LINK] Electrical Light Predating Edison
[LINK] Mythical Creatures in The Bible
[LINK] Airships

Short Posts
[LINK] 1546 American Map Showing Giant Cathedrals
[LINK] The Anomaly of Electrical Lighting Illustrations
[LINK] The Energy Rod Anomaly
[LINK] Gentleman of The Township

Threads
[LINK] On Supposed Videos of Activated Antiquitech
[LINK] On No-Poop Theory
[LINK] Looking at Mythical Land Creatures in 1600's Zoology Textbook
[LINK] Looking at Mythical Aquatic Creatures in 1600's Zoology Textbook

Thank you for your support over the years, it has been fun. I plan on staying on Telegram for as long as I can.

@AntiquitechArchive

👉There is a reason why the old world buildings all say established in rather than built in⁉️

𝖁𝖔𝖎𝖈𝖊𝖘 𝖔𝖋 𝕽𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 🕊

The Scientific Method:

Core Steps of the Scientific Method

1. Observation and Question: Scientists observe a naturally occuring phenomenon and formulate specific questions about it.
2. Hypothesis Formation: Based on observations, scientists develop a testable hypothesis—a proposed explanation that makes specific predictions.
3. Experimentation: Scientists design and conduct controlled experiments to test the hypothesis, gathering empirical data.
4. Analysis and Conclusion: Scientists analyze the experimental data to determine whether it supports or refutes the hypothesis, and draw appropriate conclusions.
(5. Communication and Refinement: Scientists publish their findings for peer review, allowing others to replicate experiments and refine hypotheses through further testing.) <=Not really necessary imo. As the scientific method, if performed correctly, either proves or disproves something, definitively.

Components of a Well-Formed Hypothesis

A proper scientific hypothesis must be:

1. Falsifiable: Must be capable of being proven wrong through experimentation.
2. Precise: Must make specific predictions about what will happen under defined conditions.
3. Variable-Focused: Must clearly identify:

The independent variable (what the researcher manipulates or changes)
The dependent variable (what the researcher measures as a result)
The proposed relationship between these variables ("If X changes, then Y will respond in Z way")

4. Controllable: Must account for:

Control groups to provide a baseline comparison
Controlled variables (factors kept constant throughout the experiment)
Potential confounding variables that might affect results

5. Explanatory: Must propose a causal mechanism that explains the observed phenomenon.
6. Parsimonious: Should be the simplest explanation consistent with existing knowledge.

The identification of variables and controls is essential to proper experimental design and is foundational to the scientific method's ability to establish causation rather than merely correlation. Without these elements, a hypothesis lacks the structure needed for rigorous testing.

So in conclusion, most pseudoscientists fail to employ the scientific method in the second step (and often in the first step!!). If the independent variable does not exist or cannot be controlled and manipulated by the observer, then it isn’t following the scientific method!!

So there goes ALL of astronomy, astrophysics and theoretical physics. Oops!

@TheParanormiesPresent
@AltSkull48

Built with nothing but a hammer and chisel, without a spark of electricity, and material transported into place by steadfast donkeys

Scotland

THE COCKATRICE

Mythical Creatures in The Bible

—>The Dragon [LINK]
—>The Unicorn [LINK]
—>The Satyr [LINK]
—>The Cockatrice [LINK]

—|RETURN TO NAVIGATION|—

@AntiquitechArchive

I have an idea for a series on this channel and I think you guys will find it both interesting and amusing.

Alright here we go.