Here's the Analysis of APLINE :

#ALPINE is been moving within a strong consolidation and forming a range between the major support zone and resistance zone of $1.03 - $1.09 and $1.46 - $1.52 respectively. All eyes on breakout and retest for buys.

#BITCOIN DAILY TF UPDATE :

#BITCOIN on Daily TF, did attempted the move but retraced back to the support zone to the and retracted too. Expected the whole move up from here for next week.

#ZRO given a good breakout but started ranging below the resistance area and dropped hard with market conditions. Price again entered the range so look for the LTF to change the direction.

To compare the impact of ETFs on Bitcoin and Ethereum markets, we've normalized ETF netflow volume against corresponding spot volumes. This ratio reveals the relative weight of ETFs in each market. The analysis shows that Ethereum ETFs influence about ±1% of spot volume, while Bitcoin ETFs affect ±8%. Despite normalization, this indicates that appetite for Bitcoin ETFs remains significantly higher than for Ethereum ETFs, roughly an order of magnitude larger. This disparity suggests a considerably stronger market presence and investor interest in Bitcoin ETFs compared to their Ethereum counterparts.

What is S2F (Stock 2 Flow) Model ?

In simple terms, the Stock to Flow (SF or S2F) model is a way to measure the abundance of a particular resource. The Stock to Flow ratio is the amount of a resource held in reserves divided by the amount it is produced annually.

The Stock to Flow model is generally applied to natural resources. Let’s take the example of gold. While the estimates may vary, the World Gold Council estimates that around 190,000 tons of gold have ever been mined. This amount (i.e., the total supply) is what we can refer to as the stock. Meanwhile, there are about 2,500-3,200 tons of gold mined each year. This amount is what we can refer to as the flow.

Stock to Flow and Bitcoin

If you understand how Bitcoin works, it won’t be difficult for you to understand why applying the Stock to Flow model to it might make sense. The model essentially treats bitcoins comparably to scarce commodities, like gold or silver.

Gold and silver are often called store of value resources. They, in theory, should retain their value over the long term due to their relative scarcity and low flow. What’s more, it’s very difficult to significantly increase their supply within a short period of time.

According to the advocates of the Stock to Flow model, Bitcoin is a similar resource. It’s scarce, relatively costly to produce, and its maximum supply is capped at 21 million coins. Also, Bitcoin’s supply issuance is defined on the protocol level, which makes the flow completely predictable. You also might have heard about the Bitcoin halvings, where the amount of new supply entering the system is halved every 210,000 blocks (roughly four years).

Here's the Analysis of #NEAR :

#NEAR is been bouncing off from the major support zone of $4.30 -$4.50 and also with a confluence with the trendline. Price looks good enough to move up from here and with a potential range of 25%.

#BITCOIN WEEKLY TF UPDATE :

#BITCOIN on Weekly TF, closed candle very decent and saw a sell-off due to fundamental news. News Aligned with the price action and levels and currently, price is rejecting the support zone of support zone around $62,000. Its a range now, need to wait for the next weekly closings.

#DXY UPDATE :

#DXY had a sharp jump due to conflict and signs of war and had a Bullish Engulfing candlestick pattern in the Weekly TF. Price on Daily TF, tapped into a resistance now and index might hodl for a while next week, before going any more up. Overall, market will me impacted towards down in this case.

To compare ETF impact on Bitcoin and Ethereum markets, we normalized ETF netflow volume against spot volumes. This reveals that Ethereum ETFs influence about ±1% of spot volume, while Bitcoin ETFs affect ±8%. Despite normalization, this indicates Bitcoin ETFs have significantly higher market presence and investor interest, approximately an order of magnitude larger than Ethereum ETFs. This disparity highlights a much stronger appetite for Bitcoin ETFs in the current market.

#ETH ANALYSIS :

#ETH dropped more than the expected as overall market got an impact. Price currently, slide below the support and closing to, with that price trying to give a close above too, which might turn it into a fakeout.

#BTC gradually started moving up towards the strong resistance area. Weekly had a decent closing too with a rejection too. So we its officially a range now and need to see a break of these area in Daily TF and eyes on upcoming Weekly closing too.

#US30 UPDATE :

#US30 entered into a consolidation and last week it made a new All Time Highs. Its was still expected to have a drop to 41,600 area or there should be a Daily closing above the range to go for buys and expect a new #ATH too.

The Bitcoin Realized Cap, measuring cumulative network capital flow, has plateaued at $622 billion over the last two months. This follows six months of range-bound, downward market movement. The stagnation indicates that most Bitcoin transactions are occurring near original acquisition prices, suggesting a market equilibrium with minimal new capital inflow or outflow. This trend reflects reduced volatility and possible investor uncertainty in the current market conditions.

What are storage miners?

Storage mining is a type of cryptocurrency mining that allows miners to receive rewards for storing data on their personal servers or devices. One of the main concepts of storage mining is that miners have to dedicate a certain amount of storage space to become eligible to be a node of the blockchain network.

One of the most notable cryptocurrencies that depends on storage mining in its operations is Filecoin. The Filecoin blockchain relies on the storage capacity of its miners in order to select eligible nodes. These nodes then serve as transaction verifiers and miners of new blocks which are added to the chain.

Entrusting the node-selection process to a storage-based consensus mechanism is somewhat experimental in the cryptocurrency industry. Most popular blockchains rely on either proof-of-work (PoW) or proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms. However, blockchains like Filecoin utilize storage power as a measure for node eligibility. Node validators are selected based on the amount of storage power they can offer to the network. In return, nodes or storage miners receive mining rewards. In the case of Filecoin, storage miners receive FIL tokens for successful block creation.

The storage that miners dedicate to the network is utilized by users of the Filecoin blockchain and system. This is why the consensus mechanism requires all approved notes to be able to prove that they have the storage power needed and that they have an updated copy of the whole system on their servers at all times.

Interestingly, storage miners can choose whether they would like to dedicate cloud storage or hardware storage. This makes it incredibly easy for storage miners to acquire additional storage power and move up in node rankings.

Storage-based consensus mechanisms are rarely utilized in the blockchain industry, however, Filecoin is proof that this system can be successful. Not only that, the highly customizable requirements regarding the type of storage power requested by the network allow storage miners a significant amount of flexibility. This flexibility in node requirements is not usually present in more established consensus mechanisms.

#FIDA/USDT here is gearing up for the big jump from horizontal support 🚀

Buy on MEXC: https://www.mexc.com/exchange/FIDA_USDT

Buy on Binance: https://www.binance.com/en/trade/FIDA_USDT

Short term targets: 10%-30%-50%